Congress Should Eliminate Differences in Drug Sentencing
Michigan Chronicle › August 18, 2009
Linked as:
Michigan Chronicle › August 18, 2009
Linked as:Summary
According to the Sentencing Project, the average crack cocaine sentence is 52 percent longer than the average sentence for powder cocaine. Defendants convicted with five grams of crack cocaine are sentenced to a five-year mandatory minimum sentence. For offenses involving powder cocaine, a five-year sentence is only handed down when the crime involves 500 grams of the drug. Lawmakers erroneously believed crack was more addictive and bred more violence than powdered cocaine, so the penalties for the drug were set higher. Scientists say that crack is no more addictive than cocaine and that there is no reasoning for the sentencing differences. These disparities are rooted in racial bias. Two thirds of the nation's crack users are White. Yet, according to a study conducted by the American Civil Liberties Union, 80 percent of crack defendants are Black and 93 percent of those sentenced to prison for crack-related offenses are Black and Latino. When White crack users are arrested, statistics show they are rarely prosecuted. If they are, they are less likely to be convicted.
See the full content of this document
Extract
Congress Should Eliminate Differences in Drug Sentencing
In the mid-1980s, when crack cocaine exploded onto the urban scene, violence became a way of life in many communities as gangs and dealers fought over valuable turf. "...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
33 cfr 154.1060 submission and approval procedures. | 31 CFR 591.704 - Penalty imposition or withdrawal. | Edwina Bridges v. H. G. Rhodes, (8th Cir. 2002) | Kenneth Sandstrom, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cultor Food Science, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee., 214 F.3d 795 (7th Cir. 2000) | sentencia nº 2351 de consiglio di stato, may 08, 2009 | Sentencia nº 2022 de Consiglio di Stato, April 16, 2008 | Sentencia nº 6392 de Consiglio di Stato December 21 2009 | Sentencia nº 406 de Consiglio di Stato January 27 2010